Use of non-distinctive signs

In AWA Blog, Uncategorized

21 March, 2016

The new Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 amending Council Regulation 207/2009/EC on the Community Trade Mark will enter into force from 23 March 2016


To the list of activities which a trademark owner will not in future be able to prevent a further exclusion has been added. The descriptive use defense (on the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, and geographical origin, time of production or other characteristics of the goods) has been extended to apply also to use of signs which are not distinctive. Thus, third parties will now have as a defence available against alleged infringement to claim that they use the sign in a descriptive way, provided that the use is made in good faith. Such use should always remain free for third parties.

The provision seems a bit odd. If a sign is not distinctive, it will not be used ‘as a trade mark’ when used and then there is no infringement pursuant to Article 10. Therefore, you will not come to the question of a limitation of the proprietor’s rights pursuant to the new Article 12 1 (b).

It must be presumed that a trademark is distinctive as long as it is registered. However, if a third party invokes the new Article 12 (1) (b) and successfully claims that the identical mark is used in a descriptive way, this would logically mean that the registered trademark is not distinctive and should be declared invalid. Or, if it is a combined word and device trademark, the proprietor will not have any protection for the descriptive word element as such.

Niclas Dahlberg, Attorney at Law

You may also read!

geographicorigins4irinventions

IP within IoT and the fourth industrial revolution

According to a new study Patents and the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), conducted by the EPO the number of

Read more...
Directors Beware: New Swedish judgment regarding personal liability for patent infringement for the directors of a company

Directors Beware: New Swedish judgment regarding personal liability for patent infringement

The Swedish Patent and Market Court (PMD) announced an interesting judgment concerning the Board of Directors’ personal liability for

Read more...
Re-registered domain names used for trademark infringements on a large scale

Re-registered domain names used for trademark infringements

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has recently released a report based on phase two of a study

Read more...

Leave a reply:

Your email address will not be published.

Mobile Sliding Menu