Changes in the Taiwanese Patent Act

In Insights, Uncategorized

8 December, 2011

Further to our information relating to the Taiwanese Trademark Act, the Legislative Yuan on November 29, 2011, passed the draft amendment to the Patent Act proposed by the Executive Yuan. The date on which this Act takes effect will be decided by the Executive Yuan. It is estimated this Act will come into force one year after ratification of the President.

The main points further improving the Taiwanese patent system are summarized below. 

  1. The applicant can claim a grace period of six months prior to the filing date, due to own disclosure through printed publication.
  2. It will be possible to apply for reinstatement if the applicant unintentionally failed to claim priority, pay issue fee, or pay annuity fee within the statutory time.
  3. The applicant may file a divisional application within 30 days from when the notice of allowance is rendered.
  4. It will be possible to apply for a compulsory license to produce pharmaceuticals and export them to developing countries to solve their public health problems.
  5. Additionally, it will be possible for an applicant to file an invention patent application and a utility model application at the same time. However, TIPO will ask the applicant to select one of the applications when the patent application is allowed, and the unselected one does not exist ab initio.

The amendment to the Patent Act is aimed at encouraging and protecting inventions and creations in order to promote the development of various industries. This includes the encouragement of invention patents, utility model patents and design patents.

Magnus Nilsson, European Patent Attorney

You may also be interested in:

Sweden’s Proposed Patents Act

On 11 April 2024, the Swedish Council on Legislation was presented with a new Swedish Patents Act proposal. The

Read more...
City landscape with trademarks visible

CNIPA’s Regulations on Collective and Certification Trademarks: keypoints highlighted

The regulations contain 28 provisions across several critical topics Registrants of collective and certification marks must implement several acts

Read more...

Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Comparing China’s AI Regulations with the EU AI Act

The recent passing of the EU AI Act presents an opportunity to conduct a comparative law analysis against China’s

Read more...

Mobile Sliding Menu