The IP5 launch a PPH pilot programme

In Insights, Uncategorized

9 January, 2014

According to the EPO, the world’s five largest Intellectual Property Offices, called IP5, have announced the agreement to launch a comprehensive IP5 Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) pilot programme, IP5 PPH, intended to take effect in January 2014. 

The IP5 are the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Korean IP Office (KIPO), the State IP Office of the People’s Republic of China (SIPO) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

When entering into effect the IP5 PPH programme thus means that the EPO will have PPH agreements with not only the JPO and the USPTO but also with the KIPO and the SIPO. This offers new interesting possibilities for applicants using the EPO as the office for first filing of patent applications and desiring accelerated examination of their corresponding patent applications outside Europe.

The IP5 PPH programme will utilise of both PCT and national work products. Also, the PPH arrangements currently operational between any two of the IP5 offices will be integrated in the IP5 PPH programme.

The details of the IP5 PPH programme are not yet published, but as always the Awapatent IP Blog will follow the developments.

Troels Peter Rørdam, European Patent Attorney & Certified Danish Patent Agent

Link to the press release of the EPO regarding the IP5 PPH programme

You may also be interested in:

Sweden’s Proposed Patents Act

On 11 April 2024, the Swedish Council on Legislation was presented with a new Swedish Patents Act proposal. The

Read more...
City landscape with trademarks visible

CNIPA’s Regulations on Collective and Certification Trademarks: keypoints highlighted

The regulations contain 28 provisions across several critical topics Registrants of collective and certification marks must implement several acts

Read more...

Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Comparing China’s AI Regulations with the EU AI Act

The recent passing of the EU AI Act presents an opportunity to conduct a comparative law analysis against China’s

Read more...

Mobile Sliding Menu